Former stick insect Tyra Banks has introduced a high-stakes criminal battle in opposition to Netflix.
In step with media reviews, Banks filed an enormous defamation lawsuit in opposition to the streaming large on June 13, 2026, following her arguable portrayal within the newly launched docuseries “Fact Test: Inside of The us’s Subsequent Most sensible Style”.
The lawsuit takes direct intention on the streaming provider’s advertising ways, claiming that the challenge “used to be offered to audience as a documentary collection” whilst allegedly misrepresenting the information in the back of the long-lasting truth display.
The lawsuit states: “Netflix known as it ‘the definitive, must-watch chronicle of The us’s Subsequent Most sensible Style’. The style issues. Audience of a documentary don’t be expecting manufactured drama or built narratives. They be expecting information.”
“As a result of they have been promised a documentary, this is precisely how audience interacted with the Netflix Collection,” the lawsuit added, claiming that many clips have been “stripped of context and reassembled to enhance a false and defamatory narrative unrelated to what she in reality expressed.”
The lawsuit states that Banks agreed to make an look within the display as “she believed audience deserved a candid dialog concerning the display’s legacy—its successes and its shortcomings.” However as an alternative of taking part in truthful, the swimsuit alleges, Netflix utterly axed the pictures the place she took blame for the display’s greatest scandals, leaving audience with a deceptively edited ultimate reduce designed to make her glance dangerous.
Within the docuseries, which explored alleged incidents of bullying, frame shaming and racial profiling at the “The us’s Subsequent Most sensible Style” set, cycle 2 contestant Shandi Sullivan claimed she were sexually assaulted on-camera whilst filming the display in Italy in 2003.
The lawsuit states that Banks used to be requested without delay concerning the harrowing incident all the way through her interview for the Netflix docuseries, and she or he made it transparent she had completely no involvement in what came about. On the other hand, the 52-year-old stick insect claims that Netflix cleverly reduce the pictures to make it seem like she used to be in my opinion accountable for a similar.
“The false narrative the manufacturers built via selective enhancing, planned omission, and surgical manipulation of continuing pictures incorporated that Ms. Banks knowingly allowed a contestant to be sexually assaulted on her display, exploited that contestant’s trauma for scores, after which may just no longer even bring it to mind when requested,” the submitting learn. “That narrative about Ms. Banks is an entire fabrication, person who Netflix streamed to an international target audience of tens of millions.”
Whilst Banks, who served as government manufacturer and host of twenty-two cycles of the display, ranging from 2003, did “percentage her facet,” the submitting added, “her solutions have been very truthful. However the tale that audience heard used to be the misleading tale manufacturers selected to inform.”
The 2026 docuseries featured interviews from Banks, in addition to government manufacturer Ken Mok and previous judges Jay Manuel, Leave out J. Alexander and Nigel Barker as they recalled the most productive and worst on-air moments of “The us’s Subsequent Most sensible Style”. The exposé additionally featured former contestants of the truth display who shared their stories.
For extra Read Now.
For More News updates : https://asiapedia.in